Selling A Cure Shouldn’t Be THIS Hard

Twitter & Google Still Restrict The Cure

I tried running an ad for a line of merchandise called “The Cure For COVID.” Despite redefining the parameters multiple times, it generated 0 impressions. It did not even charge my account. The system refused to run my ad. Google was temporarily not indexing my product pages over it as well. That is why mostly on the site you’ll see produced renamed as “The Cvre For COVID.”

However, Twitter has enabled countless accounts to push a lot of lies about COVID including improper treatments like ivermectin. Google also indexes a book touting ivermectin as a cure. Other silly articles about things like Viagra being considered a cure also proliferate. But my website which is simply advocating that nothing is necessary to cure COVID – because it isn’t a virus – are blocked from public consumption. That is dangerous.

Deadly, in fact.

If you look around anymore, there are a fringe group of whackos that claim “long covid” causes everything from mental health disorders to literally AIDS.

Others have emerged with flat-Earth type conspiracies claiming that viruses don’t exist at all. Somehow I have gotten lumped in with people like that.

That’s not at all what I’m saying.

What I’m saying is simpler.

For some? Too simple.

COVID doesn’t need a cure because it isn’t a virus. It’s just a word.

Viruses exist. But COVID isn’t a virus. So, as a virus, it doesn’t exist at all.

Reexamining THE Narrative

This is Not Like Any “Theory” You’ve Heard Before

Before diving deeper, let me be clear: this is not just another COVID-19 “theory” like the ones you’ve heard. It’s not about vaccines being poison, RFK Jr.’s fixation on mercury, or conspiracy-laden rabbit holes that distract from the core issue. While some of those topics might warrant exploration, they often serve as noise. What I am saying is far simpler, yet more difficult to accept: there was no novel virus, and nothing done in response to it was necessary.

This perspective isn’t about downplaying the pandemic or debating whether masks worked. It’s about dismantling the very premise that a pandemic even existed. The truth is:

• The virus SARS-CoV-2 was never proven to be a unique or dangerous pathogen.
• No new or unprecedented medical interventions were needed, and the situation could have been managed exactly like seasonal flu or other respiratory illnesses.
• What followed—lockdowns, mandates, vaccines—was not a public health response but a cultural, political, and economic phenomenon designed to profit off fear.

My Journey to Understanding the Lie

In February 2020, when fear about a new virus was spreading rapidly, I’ll admit: I was cautious. Like many, I was hesitant to go to public places and wanted to understand whether this was A Big Deal or No Deal at All. It was difficult to tell at first.

When President Trump declared a national state of emergency in March 2020, something clicked for me. Suddenly, it didn’t matter what “it” was, because “they” were handling it this way. From that moment, I knew that what followed would have far more to do with government control and media manipulation than with any biological threat. That made me nervous especially not knowing if COVID was dangerous or not.

Biden did not “undeclare” this emergency until April of 2023. He allowed this to continue for longer than Trump did. A leaked rumor that Biden would pardon Fauci would be good for Trump as well, so he is never blamed for it all. Though most people refuse to accept it, Biden & Trump have collaborated more than has been publicly acknowledged already.

The political fight over COVID-19 between Democrats and Republicans only entrenched both sides in posturing instead of solving any problems. This absurdity pushed me to dig deeper. At the same time, I was studying the media response to the upcoming presidential election and the George Floyd situation. I became steeped in how propaganda shapes narratives and drives people to act against their own interests. By the summer of 2020 I got very confused about the fact that no one was talking about SARS-CoV-1. That it wasn’t being mentioned at all, which set off alarm bells for me. If this virus was so closely related, why was the earlier SARS outbreak being erased from public discussion?

So, the virus is ~80% (or more) genetically identical to SARS, yet it’s name contains 0 of the same letters and there’s a leap forward in numbering?

COVID-19 Is A Language Virus

It probably wasn’t until 2021 that I fully developed my theory of what I call a language virus. Think of it not as a biological pathogen, but as something more like a computer virus. Words, like computer code, were being distributed through television, social media, and the internet. This word—COVID-19—along with reports of cases and deaths, stock market fluctuations, and government mandates, acted like programming. It drove people to action: to fear, to compliance, to conformity.

Rooted In America’s Most Influential Cult Ideology

There’s an old idea from the “human potential movement” that human beings are like computers—machines that can be programmed. I realized people like Fauci genuinely believe (and perhaps rightly so) that they can hack behavior. They see words, symbols, and numbers as tools for engineering human action. People like Steve Jobs believed in this kind of ideology. Modern technocrats like Elon Musk & Peter Thiel do too.

Eventually, it became clear to me that Fauci is exactly the kind of man who could invent something “from nothing.” He is the kind of person who could elevate a meaningless construct to global significance, treating it like the most important thing in the world to advance his own self-gratifying desires. By summer 2021, I was certain: this wasn’t a pandemic. It was a delusion engineered by words.

Knowing this, I decided to try to use words and symbols to undo what Fauci did. To “cure” the world of COVID-19. I began speaking out, publishing my findings, and creating messages to counter the fear-mongering narrative. Words created the illusion of a pandemic, and I believed words could dismantle it.

Using Words and Actions to Fight Back

My conviction wasn’t just an intellectual exercise—I lived it. While others complied with mandates or went silent, I took direct action:

• I never got tested for COVID-19. I refused to participate in the apparatus that inflated numbers and legitimized the pandemic narrative.
• I did not get vaccinated. I saw no reason to inoculate myself against something that posed no threat to me.
• I stopped going to places that required masks and demanded mask-optional spaces wherever I could. I refused to normalize the fear-driven behaviors being forced upon us.
• I wrote graffiti in public places to steal media attention on gigantic highway walls all over the East Coast protesting against the linguistic constructs which were enabling lockdowns, and the manipulation of public health measures.
• Despite being harassed by friends, family, neighbors, and even my landlord, I published my findings and stood firm in my principles. The backlash was immense, but I never backed down.
• When my business was effectively shut down, I refused to take on any projects that even used the word COVID. This decision made my financial situation incredibly difficult, but I would not compromise my values.
• I never lied about “having COVID” or “being vaxxed” to fit in socially or escape scrutiny. My integrity remained intact.

Leadership Is Lacking

These actions weren’t just symbolic—they were my way of saying no to the narrative. If Fauci and his allies used words and symbols to manipulate the world, I would use them to fight back.

Despite some high profile people like Joe Rogan claiming to be censored or attacked on these issues, he has no idea what that is really like. He also pushed the lie that ivermectin was an appropriate treatment. The odds are he is or was invested in the entities who control patents on that kind of thing. His lackeys pushed the legitimacy of his communication on this stuff which is why it perpetuates. Nobody wants to lose their leader.

Proving the Lie with Real Lives

My understanding of the narrative wasn’t just theoretical—it had real-world implications. In at least two cases, I directly intervened when medical professionals were enforcing draconian restrictions under the guise of “COVID-19 protocols.” In both instances, loved ones were on life support, and the families were denied access because of so-called COVID-19 rules. I refused to accept the word “COVID-19” as a justification for inhumane decisions and took decisive action:

• Case 1: Under the threat of calling the police to escalate the situation, I forced hospital staff to abandon their COVID-19 restrictions and allow proper medical procedures that would have been routine in 2018 or earlier. The patient, a man over 50 with extreme preexisting conditions like cancer, got off life support and is still alive today. He was apparently the only person to survive this treatment.
• Case 2: In a similar situation, my refusal to accept the fraudulent narrative led to the prolonging of another man’s life, despite being expected to die much sooner.

Phony Miracles, From Snake Oil Salesmen

These interventions weren’t miracles—they were simply the result of rejecting the false authority of the word “COVID-19” and insisting on basic medical ethics. It was almost like a miracle. After nobody was “allowed” to say the word COVID, they were able to test for and clear up pneumonia. It also revealed that a proper treatment included non-invasive ventilation as an intermediary measure. The results proved my linguistic theory: once the artificial rules were stripped away, people were saved. This is science in action—hypothesis, test, result.

Rather than being congratulated, appreciated, and credited – I was shunned, ostracized, and treated like an unAmerican terrorist for bucking the overarching narratives provided to both sides of the political spectrum.

I had no friendlies in the Republican camp because I blamed Trump’s Operation Warp Speed. That was the most catastrophic failure in American history. He should never be forgiven for that. It was actually the most fascistic time of his entire epoch of political life. Liberals won’t ever admit that because they championed this time. Conservatives won’t challenge their leader even as he pushes us to the brink in new & confounding ways. 

Fauci’s 2024 Paper: The Original Lie Comes Full Circle

In 2024, Anthony Fauci authored a paper where he effectively admitted what had been suspected by many all along: nothing novel was ever created in his lab. The paper, published amidst growing scrutiny of his role in the pandemic’s origins, repeated his insistence on the now-debunked theory that COVID-19 arose from animal-to-human transmission at a wet market. This was the same lie he told the world in early 2020, the lie that became the foundation of the global panic.

• Fauci’s admission in the paper was subtle, couched in scientific language, but unmistakable. He essentially confirmed that no gain-of-function research in his lab produced anything resembling SARS-CoV-2.
• This directly undermines the lab-leak theory—an idea that both skeptics and proponents of the pandemic narrative have clung to. Fauci’s words, whether intentional or not, reveal that there was nothing to leak.
• An employee of the Wuhan lab confirmed that nothing resembling SARS-CoV-2 was ever in their lab. Gain of function is a fraud.

But here’s where it gets even more absurd: Fauci’s public “opponents” are now contradicting themselves by asserting the exact opposite. Those claiming Fauci is a liar are now insisting that, because he lied about so much else, he must also be lying about this—that he did, in fact, create something novel in the lab. These people supposedly challenging Fauci, are actually reinforcing the same flawed narrative of a lab-engineered supervirus. It’s a vicious circle.

Meanwhile, those who still support Fauci’s actions are promoting his “goodness” or staying silent, refusing to engage with the implications of his paper. Fauci’s ability to play both sides of the aisle—opponents and defenders alike—is a testament to his skill at manipulating public discourse.

The Testing Scam

COVID-19’s global “threat” was manufactured by unprecedented testing:

• PCR tests, run at high cycle thresholds, detected traces of viral RNA that didn’t necessarily indicate active infection or transmissibility.
• Asymptomatic individuals were labeled as “infected,” even though asymptomatic transmission was never conclusively proven.
• Meanwhile, SARS-CoV-1 was never tested at scale. Had similar testing been done for SARS-CoV-1—or even for flu, RSV, and pneumonia—we might have seen similar “pandemic” numbers in the past

In other words, the sample size of tests of SARS-CoV-2 are drastically higher than SARS-CoV-1 (which had a much higher lethality rate) so we really don’t know how to compare them. But at best, Fauci was involved in monitoring an even less lethal form of SARS. That’s a pretty sad story if you think about it.

The result? A flood of “cases” that created the illusion of a global emergency.

The Vaccine Mirage

Enter the vaccines—mRNA, adenovirus vector, and others—touted as the silver bullet to end the “pandemic.” But here’s the truth:

• Each vaccine was designed with different fundamental science, yet they were marketed as one: “THE vaccine.” This created confusion about what was even on the market to begin with.
• The vaccines were also rushed to market, bypassing traditional safety protocols, under the guise of emergency which injured many. Their government protection for vaccine injury is predicated on this narrative remaining in place. If the marketing lies were exposed, vaccine companies could be held liable under different conditions.
• People were led to believe they were inoculating themselves against a unique, deadly threat. In reality, they were receiving vaccines against a virus that posed no significant danger to most.
• Worse, these vaccines didn’t prevent transmission or infection—they merely claimed to reduce severe outcomes. Meanwhile, the vaccinated remained vulnerable to flu, RSV, and other viral infections.

The kicker? Many people who took these vaccines didn’t need them at all. They were not at risk from COVID-19, yet they exposed themselves to unknown long-term side effects for no reason.

Accountability Must Follow

COVID-19 wasn’t a virus. It was a word. It was a narrative created by people like Fauci, Levine, and Trump—leaders who pulled the metaphorical fire alarm when nothing was happening. These figures manipulated systems, defied common sense, and profited from fear.

They must still be held accountable:

• Anthony Fauci must face consequences for his lies, his misuse of taxpayer dollars, and his role in creating the illusion of a pandemic.
• Rachel Levine must answer for policies that directly harmed the most vulnerable while protecting their own interests.
• Donald Trump must take responsibility for declaring a state of emergency, enabling this chain of events, and amplifying the fear.

Their actions created untold suffering, economic devastation, and a culture of distrust. Accountability is not just necessary—it’s vital to ensure this never happens again.

Plenty of others should be held accountable as well, but the public needs to simplify that concept into a single individual they can ascribe primary blame.

COVID-19 = Nothing

Let’s recap:

• The virus: SARS-CoV-2 was never proven to be novel or dangerous.
• The testing: Inflated case numbers created a crisis where none existed.
• The vaccines: Rushed, unnecessary, and harmful for many.
• The semantics: The only thing that leaked was a word—a fabricated narrative spread faster than any pathogen.
• The fraud: Fauci used taxpayer dollars to perpetuate an illusion while profiting off a manufactured crisis.

In the end, COVID-19 wasn’t a virus, a pandemic, or a global threat. It was a word. A story. A collective delusion.